Contract ingestion and clause extraction
Agreements read into a structured model — parties, governing law, term, notice, liability, change-of-control — with the source page beside every extracted clause.
LAW24
Legal work as a system, not a filing cabinet.
A legal intelligence platform for contracts, corporate records and due diligence — obligations, deadlines and opinions kept with the documents they came from, so legal work is queryable rather than reconstructed from a shared drive.
DomainCorporate and commercial law
AnchorContracts, records, obligations
ScopeMatter to opinion to archive
AI roleExtraction, comparison, drafting
Law packscoverage to be confirmed
Intake→Extract→Classify→Obligations→Review→Opinion→Archive
The problem
The advice is in a PDF. The obligation is in someone's calendar.
Contracts are signed and then forgotten until a renewal, a dispute or a buyer's questionnaire. Corporate records live in a cupboard. Legal due diligence is a fresh data room every deal. The connection between a clause, the advice given on it and the deadline it created is rebuilt from memory.
LAW24 keeps that connection as the unit of record, so a lawyer can open any obligation and see the clause, the opinion and the person who signed it.
Who it is for
General counsel and in-house legal
Running the contract estate, the legal calendar and the advice record without a parallel spreadsheet.
Company secretarial teams
Minutes, filings, licences and board calendars kept against the same entity master.
Law firms and legal practices
Serving a portfolio of clients on one matter methodology, with privilege-aware access.
Deal teams
Legal due diligence in the same room as RISK24 tax and financial review, against shared evidence.
Core capabilities
01
02
Obligation and deadline register
Every date, condition and notice period lifted into a live register, so renewals and breaches are visible before they arrive as a crisis.
03
Corporate records and legal calendar
Constitutive documents, minutes, licences and statutory filings held against the entity, with the calendar that those records imply.
04
Playbooks and clause libraries
Preferred positions, fallbacks and jurisdiction packs versioned, so negotiation starts from the last approved answer rather than a blank page.
05
Legal due diligence
A deal room for legal issues: requests, findings and reports that share evidence with RISK24 when tax, financial and legal review run together.
06
Versioned opinions and advice records
Advice issued as a record with its facts, its authorities and its author — retrievable when the same question returns two years later.
07
Matter workflow
Intake, assignment, review and sign-off with privilege-aware access and a complete log of who saw what, when.
08
Comparison and change detection
Incoming drafts compared to the last signed version and to the playbook, with the deltas routed to a lawyer rather than buried in markup.
AI reads, compares and drafts. A lawyer decides. Nothing that looks like advice leaves the system unsigned.
A language model never issues an opinion. Extraction and comparison are assistive; the obligation register and the sign-off trail are deterministic and inspectable.
How the platform works
Five layers, one line from the document to the deadline
01
Data engine
Ingest contracts, minutes, licences and correspondence into a controlled store.
02
Playbook engine
Versioned clause libraries and jurisdiction packs, effective-dated.
03
Obligation engine
Dates, conditions and notice periods computed from the signed text.
04
Matter engine
Workflow, privilege, review and the opinion record.
05
AI intelligence layer
Extraction, comparison, gap detection and drafting for review.
Example workflow
Legal due diligence on a share purchase
Illustrative sequence, not a client engagement.
01
The target's contracts, minutes and licences are loaded into the deal room; AI proposes a classification and flags what is missing.
02
Change-of-control, assignment and termination clauses are extracted with the source page beside each hit.
03
The obligation register lists upcoming renewals, consents required for closing, and licences that lapse on a change of ownership.
04
Findings that also carry tax or earnings impact are linked to the same evidence in RISK24 rather than restated in a second memo.
05
The lawyer reviews low-confidence extractions, corrects the record, and issues the legal DD report from the same model.
06
After close, the signed SPA and the findings become the opening corporate record — not a ZIP file on a leavers' laptop.
Outcomes
Obligations that surface themselves
Renewals and consents appear from the signed text, not from a reminder someone remembered to set.
Advice you can find again
The opinion sits on the facts and the clause, so the next lawyer does not start from zero.
One room for the deal
Legal, tax and financial findings report against the same evidence when RISK24 is in use.
Privilege by design
Access follows the matter, not a folder tree that everyone can open.
Cycle-time comparisons to be added once measured with client data
Data security and auditability
Privilege-aware access: matter teams see their files; the rest of the organisation does not.
Every extraction, correction and sign-off logged with author and time.
The signed version of a contract is immutable; later analysis never overwrites it.
Retention and legal-hold rules configurable per matter and jurisdiction.
Certifications and independent assurance to be confirmed
Integration
Contract repositories and e-signature tools for intake of executed documents.
Entity master shared with CIT24, TP24 and GMT24 so corporate records are not re-keyed.
Deal room shared with RISK24 for combined legal, tax and financial due diligence.
Calendar and ticketing systems for obligation alerts already in use.
Named system connectors to be confirmed
Put the legal file in the system that will have to defend it.
We will run one contract family and one legal due-diligence pack through LAW24 and show the obligation register, the evidence chain and the opinion record that come out.
Request a Demonstration